Thought Bombing

Good times in Edinburgh #tmlovelibraries Manglish session

Good times in Edinburgh #tmlovelibraries Manglish session

#tmlovelibraries, which took place in Edinburgh last weekend, gave my positivity stores a huge boost! Thank you to the brilliant @fkelly for organising such a great day, and for inviting me to be a part of it. Manglish was the topic of my workshop, an approach to cross curricular collaboration; Manglish about avoiding missed opportunities and empowering teachers of all disciplines to include purposeful reading, writing, Mathematics and communication in their lessons.

As I am still working on the book version of the workshop, I will avoid writing about the ins and outs of Manglish and instead share with you one simple idea for encouraging effective communication. This idea seemed to go down very well both in Edinburgh and at the recent #TMeng in Leeds so I thought it might be well worth sharing.

Thought Bombing

Below is a generic example of an exercise that you could base your own ideas for thought bombing on. This example could be translated into introducing characters from novels or poems (English); exploring the lives and decisions of historical figures (History); looking at cause and consequence (PHSE); Exploring bodily functions (Biology). The list goes on. The idea is that pupils are given a small amount of information to get them hooked and then the thought bombs are thrown in to blow their minds.

image for stim

This opening question must be thought provoking enough to get pupils talking, providing  just enough information to get them interested and to generate discussion but also holding back enough back to make the bombing worthwhile. If you were to give too much away at this stage, a decision could be made very quickly and no further discussion may be necessary. In the above exercise, pupils are asked to discuss each character and note down their reasons for or against saving or sentencing each one. They were asked to agree on a survivor; Marni is usually top of the list to begin with as she is young and has her whole life ahead of her… before the first thought bomb is thrown that is.

What is it?

The thought bomb is a plastic ball, the kind that you find in children’s ball pools. It has a small hole cut in the bottom, has been painted black and a little glitter has been sprinkled on just for added beauty. Inside the bomb, I roll up slips of paper with new knowledge about the given situation. For example, inside one thought bomb for the above idea, the paper reads: “Marni is a convicted killer.” And in another, we are told of Roberta’s charity work and of how she fosters children with disabilities. This new information makes the pupils go “Ooooooo” and changes the situation entirely, as now they have much more to take into account when making their decision. The thought bomb has exploded current understanding and forces pupils look at the situation from a different point of view.

Earlier example of thought bombing when teaching An Inspector Calls

Earlier example of thought bombing when teaching An Inspector Calls

Thought bombing is about gaining pupils’ interest and their own ideas, allowing them the freedom to explore. If you are introducing a topic such as the life of King Henry VIII, which requires pupils to know key facts, you are still introducing the key facts through the thought bombs but you are encouraging pupils to explore their own interpretation of events. How do they as individuals feel about the topic being discussed? How would they have solved problems differently to historical figures or characters? Thought bombing allows them to engage with the topic on a personal level but still allows you to introduce the key information required to cover your topic. Thought bombs are fun! Yes, they get thrown around the room (this is actively encouraged) but pupils are engaged in relevant discussions, thinking critically, communicating their own ideas and gaining valuable new knowledge in the process. 

 

 

 

Revision Overkill

Revision Sucks!

Banging on about the same old thing, in preparation for an exam, has the potential to make everyone (including you) sick. If you have found yourself in that place, I hope this helps…

My Year 11 class are sick to death of revising for the AQA Language paper! For the past half term, that has been our relentless focus. We have weekly mock exams, targeting individual areas for improvement. I am assessing exam work, home work, class work, after school work, oral work and any other work, providing as much feed forward as time will allow; with all this work going on, we could soon forget we are here to learn.

So as not to turn them off our wonderfully creative subject, I have been disguising exam preparation behind sessions such as murder mysteries and the annihilation of celebrities that we all love to hate. Lately, I have felt utterly exhausted by the pretence and they were beginning to see through my mask; although everything we were doing was worthwhile and very focussed on the right skills and content, it was all getting a bit samey. They needed a higher challenge. This called for something completely different.

One of my favourite things to teach is the A Level Text transformation. This is where A Level pupils get to choose from a wide selection of literature and transform the original into a separate genre of their choice (not necessarily nonfiction at A Level but for the purpose of what I did with this we looked specifically at nonfiction). In the past, pupils have transformed Kate Chopin’s work into transcripts between psychiatric doctors and their patients, Shakespeare’s plays into forgotten sonnets and even the work of Donne has been given the transformation treatment and became an article from Nuts Magazine. This is such a wonderfully creative process and yet must be based on a sound technical understanding of genres. I love it!

Boom! The idea hit me; why not use this technique for teaching nonfiction texts at GCSE?

In an ideal world, I would like to begin teaching pupils about the multitude of literature poems that they must get to know intimately for their summer exam. This content is purposeful as the literature exam can often be left as an after thought. Unlike the language exam, it is not cashed in as a golden ticket at the end of the year. I know that keeping the class focussed on the goal of their up coming Language exam is sensible, especially given that it takes place directly after the Christmas holiday, but by taking this idea of a text transformation, I could kill two birds with one stone.

MANHUNT

My Year 11s already understand the effects of language and structure and they get the need to interpret the meaning of a text based on its genre, audience and purpose.  Therefore, presenting them with a poem and asking them for their own interpretation was not a terribly demanding task… this is just the starter.

I hooked them by using the image below and asking: “Would you still kiss your lover if they looked like this?” As well as being the basis for a rich discussion, this gave the pupils a taste of the purpose of our chosen poem Manhunt by Simon Armitage and off they went exploring. To succeed, they had to successfully interpret the language, structure and meaning behind this poem before moving to the next stage.

Your Point Being…?

WHAT?

The outcome of the overall task was for pupils to have a deeper understanding of the technicalities involved in the creation of nonfiction texts. They should be able to repeat this method as an independent revision task without my assistance.

To maximise the benefit to them, they needed to recognise how each step of this process could assist them in their language exam. Thanks to our half term of revision, the exam structure and expectations is embedded in their minds. They could make connections fairly easily with little prompting from me (the connections are highlighted at the end of this post). They also had the added bonus of developing their understanding of a literature poem (one down plenty more to go).

HOW?

They were doing this by analysing a literature poem for language, structure and meaning, as well as choosing a nonfiction text (leaflet, blog, newspaper, magazine etc…) to transform the poem into. They had to analyse the nonfiction text before beginning their transformation and recognise which features of the poem would need to be transformed to create a successful end product so that their final transformation would be technically accurate.

WHY?

Because we were sick to death of exam preparation and it was time for a challenge. This is essentially an A Level task but my students could take it! Pupils are able to prepare for their Literature exam (albeit under the cloak of language) and do something interesting and different as well as relevant and challenging.

Search for Meaning

After analysing their nonfiction base text and poem, pupils produced a text of their own creation.  The guidelines for success were to have used the meaning, structure and language from the original poem but to have created a technically accurate product for their chosen genre. For example, if they had chosen to write a persuasive speech, they might have analysed a speech by Barak Obama for its structure, language, techniques etc… and then mirrored his techniques in their work. The content of the speech could be about victims of war, this would demonstrate an understanding of the original poem’s meaning; they might also have used the repetition of metaphor to emphasise the message and reflect Simon Armitage’s language and structure. This technique is effective across both genres and so by choosing it, pupils demonstrate skill in selecting appropriate techniques, which can cross over genres.

Example of end product

Review

As pupils are analysing texts they are able to compare the effectiveness of language (Question 4 on the higher exam) on a chosen audience and understand how language must be changed to create a new genre. They are gaining a deeper understanding of the structure and presentational features of texts (question 3 on the higher exam) and also comparing how texts are created. They are retrieving information and ideas (question 1 on the higher exam) to demonstrate that they are able to understand and interpret the meaning of a text (question 2 on the higher exam) and its effect on an audience. All of which lead to a final product, which further enhances their written skills (questions five and six on the higher exam) leading to exam success.

Same message, more challenge, more interest and, in the long run, more use.

No Pens Day

Let’s get it right!

 

“A survey of two hundred young people in an inner city secondary school found that 75% of them had communication problems that hampered relationships, behaviour and learning.”

The Communication Trust

 65% of young people in young offender institutions have communication difficulties. Reading, writing, communication (literacy)

Ofsted paper Oct 2011

 

No pens day is a whole school initiative designed to help students know the value, importance and power of effective communication. Looking back to my first lessons as a student teacher, I can remember being really proud when the Head of Department told me that I had great control over the pupils. He said they were always so quiet and obedient when he observed me and they hung on my every word. I thought this meant great learning was taking place; now I know better.

Perfect behaviour does not always mean perfect learning. How did I know my lesson was making the right connections in my pupils’ minds? How did I know they understood? Of course, I took their books home at the end of the week and wrote HUGE comments to further impress the HOD. This would take a great deal of time and pupils would have to wait for feedback. If we can get pupils to articulate their understanding there and then and we really listen to their responses, that review of learning becomes instant and effective. Opportunities to develop our pupils’ communication skills and avoid them ending up like the statistics above should not be being missed. Our no pens day aimed to start the ball rolling towards righting that wrong.

We launched the idea to staff during a training day in September based on RWCM (reading, writing, communication and mathematics). We rolled out our bespoke resources, designed to support staff in becoming teachers of RWCM. Following that, reflection, preparation and collaboration time was provided to ensure that our no pens day was successful. Departments were offered support for their planning. Students were also given a special assembly to help them see the bigger picture.

I am desperate to now start telling you about the amazing lesson that I had with my Y9 pupils exploring leadership in Lord of the Flies but I suspect the response to that might be something along the lines of “yeah but it is easy in English.” I agree, speaking and listening is easy as it is part of our content. For that reason, I will avoid this and instead go for the opposite end of the spectrum and show you how this might work in Maths.

I have chosen to demonstrate a lesson on shape, space and measurements. Pupils in this lesson will be using discussion and research to persuade their teacher that they have made progress in their knowledge and ability from the beginning of the lesson to the end. I have used APP criteria to determine the levels of mathematical understanding in this lesson; you can use whichever criteria you would ordinarily use to determine levels.

Connect

Where’s the Maths in this?

 

As pupils enter, they are faced with the above image and question and are asked to discuss the answer in their groups. At this point the differentiation is by outcome as a level two pupil might discuss the shapes that they see whereas a level five pupil might discuss the different angles contained within the shapes. Listen to pupils’ responses and know their starting level. You alone are allowed a pen and should use it to note on a register the level pupils are reaching through discussion.

New Information

Pupils are given a box full of items. This could be wheels, measuring instruments, cut out shapes, solid shapes, scissors, glue etc…. They are told that they must make progress in this lesson and will be doing this by persuading you that there is Maths in their box. On their tables is an effective communication mat, a laminated A3 sheet, outlining ideas such as using effective vocabulary, persuasive techniques, what confidence looks like, how and when to use gesture and those all important listening skills.

This is where the differentiation really kicks in, show pupils a grid of progress and ask them where they think they should begin based on their previous discussion.

Example of o progress grid

Get them to think about the words they were using to describe the Maths in the image and link it to the vocabulary in the grid. The grid will link to a task, which will allow them to build their knowledge and make progress; they should then work their way through the tasks (each one being a level higher than the last) to ensure progress. You could use a symbol for each level or just have the number of the level on it so that pupils can easily find their chosen tasks. This is similar to what I do with SOLO boxes if you want further information on how this works.

For example: A pupil has been discussing the different names for all of the angles contained in the image above (multi). To get to the next level, he needs to begin to solve problems using his knowledge of angles (relational). His task will ask him to consider the geometrical problems within his box of shapes and will direct him to reading material on what this means. If you are lucky enough to have ipads in your classroom, have them set up on revision guides for the different levels. If not, good old fashioned printed information stuck around your room will have the same effect.

Search for Meaning

As pupils are working, listen to their conversations and intervene with questions to help keep them continue to make progress. Pupils should never get to the “end” as there is always more to discover. If you hear pupils talking confidently about the properties and angles within their box and they don’t seem to be looking to move to the next level, ask them if they feel expert enough to move on and guide them to choosing the next level. If you see pupils really struggling to solve geometrical problems, ask them if they have really understood angles and make it ok to move backwards to the previous task to be able to move forwards eventually. They are still making progress as they are learning something they did not know.

Do not forget about your communication mat either. The literacy does not have to take over the mathematical learning but being able to articulate their ideas will help them to make sense of the ideas that they have. At the start of the lesson, level four pupils might have been using level two terminology. They would have started at an easy task and worked their way quickly towards something that challenged them which would raise their confidence in now using the mathematical terms they are learning.

Challenge poor vocabulary. If you hear a group discussing how trying to measure a circle with a set square is “stupid,” point at the vocabulary section of the mat and ask them if there are any better words that would make their argument stronger. The pupils might then replace stupid with “ineffective,” increasing the formality of their argument. Highlight effective communication that you see, praise it and use it as a model for the other groups. “Everyone, Billy just replaced an informal word with a more formal choice; it has really made his argument stronger.”

Demonstrate

Avoid the clichéd presentation at the end as it takes too long and bores everyone. Instead, ask pupils to teach each other what they now know by persuading another group that there is Maths in their box. You can set this up like jigsaw groups. Once again, have your register handy and really listen for progression. Pupils should have learned new mathematical ideas and techniques and should be confidently presenting them to a group of peers, using effective communication. They can use their communication mats to remind themselves of what this looks and sounds like as they present whatever they have created from their box of tricks.

Review

There are so many benefits to having a noisy classroom like this. You can listen for misconceptions to inform your planning and you can offer feedback there and then on their knowledge and understanding. Although you do have to think carefully about the set up of a lesson like this, during the lesson, you are not the one doing the hard work. The progressive tasks allow pupils to be independent and you are free to advise, question, encourage and praise.

The danger with no pen day is that people will see it as an excuse to stick on a DVD, to do group work for the sake of doing group work, to make pupils work independently and sit back with a coffee as they get it wrong and start hitting each other with rulers.

To get RWCM right is not to just do it because Ofsted say so. The teachers’ planning, preparation and collaboration stage of creating this no pens day was far more important than the day itself. Teachers need to see the bigger picture, the reason behind this way of thinking and the benefits for both themselves and their students. Just as I realised that good behaviour does not equal good learning, so too have I realised the importance of never forcing literacy and numeracy into your subject for the sake of it. I have stopped asking pupils that can classify quadrilaterals to count the lines in a poem as I hope Maths teachers will stop asking pupils who can create sonnets to spell the number one.

 

 

 

First Lesson Fun

First lessons can be great fun! Most pupils still look neat and tidy and possibly even eager to learn; they are at the very beginning of the honeymoon period and you still have a chance of making a great first impression on them. You are all rested after a long break and the marking has not yet piled up on your desk so you feel a little less stressed than usual.  

However, if you have left all of your planning to this final weekend of the holidays and still feel a little groggy from all the sun and sangria meaning you now don’t know where to start, you can use the following reflection to give you some inspiration for that first lesson back. This is how I am going to start my year with Year 9.

 Connect

Begin the lesson as an angry teacher. Be unreasonable, demand silence and bark orders at the poor, unsuspecting children. Displayed on the board behind you is the above slide, which should give them the clue that this is an act. The idea is to provoke a strong reaction from them about unreasonable behaviour. Get them to discuss the effect of this behaviour on learning. Pupils should end this first task understanding that classroom expectations are not unreasonable, nor are they there to spoil fun; they are there to create order, harmony and an excellent working environment.

I love getting dramatic! However, I know lots of teachers who would absolutely cringe at the thought of starting the term in this way. As an alternative, you could have a scenario on paper about an angry, unreasonable teacher for them to analyse. Whichever way you choose to deliver this initial meeting, they should see that negative behaviour has a negative effect on learning and this should be teased out in the conversation that follows.

Learning Outcomes

Throughout the lesson, classroom procedures and expectations will be made explicit. For example, at the end of the above task I will explain that, although I was shouting certain orders at them and this was unacceptable, some of those orders will be true of every lesson. I will reinforce my entry routine: line up outside and await my instruction to enter; all pupils are expected to collect their files and go to their allocated seat etc… This lesson is all about setting the scene for the year ahead and the following learning outcomes are shared:

  • What? To explore the expectations of our classroom
  • How? By getting to know each other and the classroom rules. You will need to be observant during the tasks to spot the classroom expectations
  • Why? To have a great start to what is going to be a fantastic year

Pupils must demonstrate that they have understood my expectations by the end of the lesson and this is made clear. Throughout every task, I will continue to explain my expectations and have them demonstrate to me what this looks like in practice. For example, this term we are exploring our identity and what makes us tick as human beings. Our investigation question is “who am I?” Pupils will be learning how to express personal thoughts through writing. As I explain this new information to them, I will also explain that I expect all pupils to put 100% effort into their work.

During the explanation of the learning outcomes, explain that pupils should be observant and the outcome is to know my expectations. Pupils should be prepared to recall my expectations later in the lesson.

New Information

To set the scene for my particular unit, I will share some information about what makes Mrs Ashes. I am not saying divulge your inner most secrets and make best friends with your class but pupils love to see a human element to teachers. The following image shows that I love to exercise, eat pizza, go out to dinner with friends etc…I am demonstrating to them that I expect everyone to take part in the sharing process, I make this explicit to them and I am modelling this myself.  

 

Search for Meaning

Now set them the challenge to write down as many things as they can think of about themselves. A good way to do this is using the think, pair and share method. Pupils have a moment to write their personal ideas down; they are then given time to share their ideas with a partner before sharing with the class. When pupils share with the class I demonstrate another expectation as I ask for no hands up and choose pupils to answer.  I do not want anyone opting out as I want my classroom to be full of active participants.

 

Next, I ask pupils if they can make my name rhyme with any of my loves. Of course they can create: “My name is Lisa and I like Pizza.” I purposefully put the pizza in for that effect. I explain that they must call me Mrs Ashes as this is a sign of respect for all of the hard work I put into them but for the purpose of this task I am using my first name (another expectation thrown in there).  I then get them to work together to create their own rhymes for their own names. Once again, ask pupils to try their best, take part, be non judgemental and helpful towards each other as they work in order to continue reinforcing the classroom expectations.

Once I am happy that pupils have something to go on that will be memorable for me, we play the memory challenge game. This helps me to learn pupils names quickly and also helps me to reinforce rules such as respecting others, taking part and being non judgemental. Pupils stand up and recite their rhymes – or none rhymes if they have a crazy unrhymable name. They can also add an action if they are a particularly lively class. I then go back around and attempt to remember as many names as possible by recalling their rhymes and or actions.

Demonstrate

Finally, bring pupils back to the original learning outcome of exploring classroom expectations. Expectations have been made clear throughout the lesson and now it is time to see what they have discovered. Set the pupils a small amount of time to recall (on paper) as many expectations as they can. Stop pupils and see who has remembered the most. Pupils enjoy the competition element of this final task and they also demonstrate that they have been observant and can tell you what you expect of them in the classroom.

Review

Pupils should have a clear understanding of your expectations by the time they leave this lesson. Continue to review these expectations in every lesson and be consistent with them.

I used to get pupils to create a classroom contract but I find that allowing them to live through the expectations is far more fun and has a similar outcome. I hope this reflection gives you some ideas for your own first lessons back.

Have a fantastic first week back and a fantastic year!

 

Differentiation by Task – A Story of Effective Collaboration

A year ago, I attended a deep learning weekend, hosted by Cramlington LV. Alongside a group of like minded teaching and learning geeks, I was up for a weekend of collaboration and self development. At the end of the weekend we were asked to present: “Six Brilliant ways I Teach My Subject.” After listening to the great Darren Mead and his work on SOLO, followed by Mark Lovatt’s exploration of effective teacher/ learner behaviours, I felt that my presentation was weak to say the least.

 What did I have to say that these teaching and learning gurus had not already heard? How could I dare to stand in front of such brilliant minds and declare that I taught my subject in a brilliant way? Unfortunately, it was too late to back out so I took a deep breath and went for it. My final thoughts being that the group had hopefully switched off after the long weekend and wouldn’t listen anyway. One of the six points on my presentation was an explanation of how I use the outside space of my classroom. I like to have tasks outside so that pupils can begin thinking about their learning before they walk through the classroom door.

Outside my Classroom

 Almost a full year had passed since that day; I was visiting Cramlington Learning Village and met up with one of the learning geeks from the deep learning weekend, David Gray. David enthusiastically danced me along to his classroom to show me what he had been working on. He explained that he had taken my idea of using outside space to create a pick and mix activity outside of his classroom.

Outside David’s room hung four plastic wallets pinned to the wall and inside them were four levels of tasks that he used to connect the pupils’ learning. Pupils at CLV are used to colour coded differentiation during Maths lessons and so they knew to pick a task which matched their level. He explained that this idea had come from my presentation; he loved how I used the outside space and he adapted the idea to fit his own lessons.

David’s Pick and Mix

After getting over the shock that anyone had listened to my presentation (let alone got anything from it) I returned to school armed with David’s pick and mix idea. I loved the idea of pupils having the choice over their learning as they entered. There was an element of choice in what I had been doing; for example, pupils chose a book cover from a choice of very pink and blue options when we were learning about style and stereotypes. However, the choice that David’s students had was differentiation by task and by choice and…I loved it!

To begin with, I hung plastic wallets outside of my room containing differentiated questions linked to the lesson. I used SOLO to build my questions from easy to difficult. For example:

• PRE: Guess what a language feature might be

• UNI: Name a language feature and its effect

• MULTI: Name as many language features as you can and their effect upon an audience • What do you know about the use of language in Wuthering Heights?

• RELATIONAL: How has language been used in Wuthering heights to manipulate the reader? How might this be compared the work of Shakespeare?

• EA: Which author has the most effective use of language features?

My SOLO Pick and Mix

Since then, I have rearranged the front of my classroom to contain my choice boxes.

Time Well Spent

The pupils enter the room and can see the learning outcomes clearly displayed on a board; this also contains the level of thinking that I want them to achieve in that lesson. Pupils make a choice about their starting point based on their understanding of the learning outcome and choose a task from the box they feel most comfortable with. I take note of the choices made and have conversations with pupils about this choice as they are working on it. Is it too easy? Is it too difficult? Why did you make that choice? At any point, they can change their mind about their choice.

I have 10X1, an amazing class that I am so proud of. I wanted them to be able to evaluate Bronte’s use of language in Wuthering Heights against Shakespeare’s in Othello. We had worked hard on extracting evidence from Othello but we only knew the storyline of Wuthering Heights and this meant that pupils needed to gain more multi structural knowledge before they could begin to think relationally about this question.  However, being very clever and wanting to achieve high grades, the pupils all walked in and went for relational (How does Bronte use language in comparison to Shakespeare?) or EA (Which is the better writer?) When they sat down and began to work through the answer, they could feel that their arguments were very one sided. They had no evidence to prove their thinking about Bronte and therefore many students had to return to the boxes and make a different choice.

 By starting the lesson in this way, pupils were forced to think carefully about their current level of thinking and what they could do in order to improve this situation. I presented the tasks as a metacognitive wrapper so that pupils thought carefully about their learning steps and, therefore, knew what they needed to do in order to reach that higher level of thinking. They knew that without gaining more multi structural knowledge, they would not be able to be truly relational and they decided on the steps they wished to take to achieve their goal. They knuckled down to work and, at the end of the lesson, they were all able to up their game and express well researched thoughts about Bronte’s use of language.

This learning experience may never have been conjured up if it were not for the collaboration between David and me. One of the reasons that I love Twitter and I enjoy attending Teach Meets is that sharing ideas, no matter how insignificant you may think they are, no matter how brilliant you think everyone else is compared to yourself, can make a single spark turn into a burning flame. I hope that this spark gets you thinking too.

Lesson 3 Revising Planning using SOLO

My GCSE class have just left the classroom smiling. It is getting so close to their English Language exam now that revision has the potential to become tedious and repetitive but it seems that developing ideas for interesting revision sessions still remains within my grasp. If you are in the same boat and are struggling for ideas to keep revision sessions alive and buzzing, then I hope the following reflection helps.

Learning Outcomes

I wanted pupils to perfect their method of exam planning so that they could produce an effective and purposeful plan within five minutes. Pupils had been taught to plan for writing tasks but they were complaining that they would either take too long and their exam answer would suffer or that they just preferred to begin writing from scratch and did not feel that any kind of a plan was necessary.

The Set Up

I set up seven tables with a different exam question taped to each. The questions were taken from past exams for inform, explain, describe, persuade and argue; for example:

  • Describe the view from your bedroom window
  • Explain the qualities of a best friend
  • You are President of the United States. Persuade your country that you should remain in power for one more term
  • The prom is being banned. Write a letter to argue for it to be reinstated

On the desks, I had also provided each group with an A1 flip chart page, divided into four on both sides (I used the back to review later). I told the pupils that they had five minutes to prepare a plan for their given question; their plan had to remain within one of the four boxes and they could not begin to add bits to their next plan as that would be cheating. I warned them that they had to work to an extended abstract level and so their ideas had to attempt to be as original and creative or as close to perfection as possible.

The Method

The first time pupils had a go and created something fairly close to the three point plan we had previously used for writing tasks (spider diagram style). However, they were missing various key components. They concentrated very much on the idea that they were coming up with but had not thought enough about the design of their work. How was this going to flow? How would the paragraphs work together to create a coherent whole?  Ultimately, they were working at a unistructural level as they were merely identifying ideas that could work well and identifying techniques that they could use. They missed out many multistructural necessities such as the punctuation, the topics and the expansion of those topics.

 

First attempt without prompt

I stopped the class after exactly five minutes (thank you teach it timer) and asked the pupils to score themselves against my example. I awarded points for everything that they should have included on our typical three point plan using my example as a guide.

 

 

I told them that they needed to get better each time and so they had to think through what their plan was missing.

 

My example to help mark ideas and prompt improvement

The class were asked to take their plans to the next table and begin work on the next question, once again with only five minutes on the clock. The next time I stopped the class, Second attempt after multistructural prompteveryone had achieved a much higher score

 

 

 

 

 

However, I had now added a new element to my plans…

Relational links between paragraphs were left out

The class had produced effective multistructural plans containing every one of the building blocks to perfect writing but they needed to add that final link that would demonstrate how their paragraphs would flow as a whole. I could see the look of “Oh man! I knew that!!” on their faces as I revealed my image to them.

Pupils were once again asked to move on and begin planning for the next question. This time pupils produced a far superior plan which included their awesome extended abstract ideas (my favourite being the view from the bedroom window was a metaphor for the soul) but it also included a very clear structure as to how this was going to be achieved, from beginning to middle to end, their work had been very carefully thought through. All of that in five minutes flat! proud.

 

...finally

 

Review

I ended the session by asking them to review their progress, asking questions of the difference between each stage using the squares on the back of their sheets to separate each level of thinking. Pupils discussed how they were merely identifying ideas to begin with before moving on to a more structured and relational approach.

I think that this lesson demonstrated to my pupils that excellent planning does not have to take forever and the need to have a certain method to their plans was crucial to success, as well as getting them moving around, thinking and enjoying the process of revision.  Now for tomorrow…

Manglish

 

I have been working with my colleague Gary Mitchelson ( @gmitch314 ), a Maths AST, since September when Gary joined our teaching and learning team; since then we have worked on many projects together, from understanding SOLO to implementing teaching and learning communities that promote outstanding practice in our school.

We think that our newest project Manglish, created through putting our linguistic and mathematical minds together, is going to be our best project yet. Last night at teach meet Hummersknott (thank you Sam @beetlebug1 for a great evening) we decided to share where we are right now. Manglish may only be in its infancy but we know that it will be quickly developed and we think it will be a great model for implementing reading, writing, communication and Maths across the whole school.

Collaboration

In our roles as in reach ASTs, we work collaboratively to plan for outstanding teaching and learning across Joseph Swan Academy. We are charged with the responsibility of ensuring that departments and teachers understand how to meet the outstanding criteria for Ofsted. Ofsted ask that reading, writing, communication and Maths are taught in a highly effective way across the whole school.

In reality

When we asked each other the question what does literacy look like in Maths and what does numeracy look like in English? We came up with some fairly cheesy answers! While looking through English schemes of work, I found counting the lines of a poem was genuinely written in as a way of developing numerical skills in pupils and similarly, Maths couldn’t see a way past spelling out numbers in a typically non linguistic subject.

This is literacy in Maths and numeracy in English in a way…but not a very good way! It is forced and it is pointless. It does not assist the pupil in reaching for a higher standard of literacy or numeracy nor does it help the teacher to develop their understanding of what a higher level is.

Why do we, as intelligent professionals, force literacy and numeracy into our schemes of work in this way? It isn’t that we are lazy; it is because of a lack of understanding on both sides. As a non specialist, could you explain what a low level of literacy looks like? As a non specialist could you do the same for numeracy? If literacy or numeracy or both are your responsibility, then I am sure that you may have all of the answers already at your fingertips but as an average teacher this is not something that comes naturally.

Subjects in secondary schools tend to stand alone. You might hear “I don’t do numbers…I’m an English teacher” or “I don’t care that the spelling is wrong…this is Maths.” This is not the typicality that Ofsted are looking for and Manglish is our answer to this. As English and Maths teachers we have our prejudged ideas about what reading writing communication and Maths should look like in our stand alone subjects but do we know that the writing techniques (PEE – spelling strategies – acronyms) or the numeracy tools (graphs – methods) that we present as specialists are being presented in the same way across the whole school?

We base our understanding of how a graph or a paragraph should be presented on our own subjects, our own education experiences and our own intelligence but are we developing reading, writing, communication and Maths effectively if we are delivering it to the same pupils in eleven different ways? This creates a disjointed experience for pupils and this is where we see Manglish creating a more relational school, not just for Ofsted but for our professional development and for our pupils’ sanity too.

Manglish

Manglish is about collaboration between subjects to develop a more relational or creatively linked together curriculum. We want pupils to see how subjects can link together as the curriculum has been planned collaboratively so that they can develop ideas from one subject when they are sitting in another. Pupils should be able to gather multi structural knowledge around the school and be actively encouraged to relate these ideas together; they are being asked to think outside of the usual subject box and they are encouraged to see the school as a community of teachers all singing from the same hymn sheet.

The most important part of our strategy is that teachers also learn from each other and become more relational in their own thinking developing a more relational organisation as a whole. Teachers should all know what a low/ medium/ high level of literacy and numeracy looks like and how to develop it further, helping the pupils to strive for excellence.

Manglish will begin its life in English and Maths and will be a collaboratively produced scheme of work produced by two polar opposite subjects. Resources will be developed as we go to ensure that everything created leads to a better understanding of literacy and numeracy levels and so that later the products of our work can be used to develop this thinking further across the school. Our whole school are currently rewriting schemes of work andGaryand I will be supporting subjects as this happens; we see the Manglish resources, which we are going to produce in the next few weeks, as being a valuable part of this process.

We want to show other literacy/ numeracy based subjects that if we can support literacy in Maths and numeracy in English (not for the sake of it but in a motivational, creative way) no matter what their subject base, they can do it too. We want to provide them with the support and tools necessary for implementation so that our school runs relationally with an outstanding ability to deliver reading writing communication and Maths, not in a forced and pointless way but in a way that is creative, fluid and typical across the whole school.

We may have just started out on this journey but I see it developing quite quickly and we hope to be ready as a whole school to deliver outstanding RWCM by September 2012.  I will be updating our progress as we go.

Purposefully Creating Friction Between Year 9s

I knew from my findings last week, trying to get Year 9 to analyse social class divides and their implications upon Blood Brothers was always going to take more than just reading the text. We had some more fun today…

Connect

As the pupils entered the room, they were given a small slip of paper and asked not to open it until I gave them permission to do so; they were told that I would let them know by saying the word “now” and from that moment on, until told otherwise, they were unable to say anything other than what was on the slip of paper that they held.

They were to begin by walking around the classroom and just greeting each other as they passed one another on their journey. When I said: “NOW!” they were to find at least three people of a similar social class to themselves and stand under the appropriate signs which were situated at opposite ends of my classroom: upper or lower.

When the pupils opened their papers, they found sentences not unlike the following: “3. y’all reet?” and “1. Good day good fellow” which they began reading out loud to each otherallow for raucous laughter and extreme volumepupils found their comrades and congregated under their newly appointed social class signs. The numbers which were printed at the start of their slips of paper corresponded to the tables that I wanted them to sit at, making for an easy transition from standing to sitting with no argument.

The Challenge

The pupils’ challenges were all the same (to create an artistic interpretation of social class divides) but what they had available to them to complete the challenge differed greatly. I had purposefully planned for a larger percentage of pupils to be lower class and I provided them with very little. They had one piece of paper per group, one pair of scissors between them all, one pot of coloured pencils and one highlighter.

Poverty

Whereas, the upper class had a multitude of resources including paints, glitter, sparkles, highlighters, scissors, glue, and different coloured papers…the list goes on. The rich were allowed to leave their seats and ask for any resource they felt they needed, after all they could afford it, leaving the poor to make do with what little they had. They were not allowed out of their seats at any time.

Abundance

The Outcome

I presented pupils with the following outcomes:

WHAT? To investigate the implications of social class divides

HOW? Through immersing ourselves in one of these roles

WHY? I left the why blank for them to work out for themselves.  I wanted to use this as a starting point for their review discussion.

As the pupils worked, I observed their behaviours carefully, noting down any discussions which helped me to make my point. Here is a snippet of what I heard:

“It’s so not fair that they have all of that stuff and we have nothing!”

“We could steal something from them because we need it.”

“We are totally better than the lower classes.”

“I hate the upper classes.”

“I’m just going to take their rubber, they’re only lower class.”

“We’re stuck here and they can do whatever they want. It’s not fair!”

“There’s lots more of them than there are of us…probably because we are special.”

Without realising it, pupils began to display behaviours which occur in real social class divides in societies like that of Liverpool in the 1980s. The pupils found that with difference came jealously, suspicion, self importance and even crime. There were positive behaviours too; lower class pupils began to improvise when they found that they did not have the materials they need. I was slightly horrified to find one of my pupils putting gum in his mouth and using it as glue but he definately gained points for improvisation. When I stopped them to review at the close of the lesson, I left plenty of time to reflect on these behaviours and how it felt to be part of a fractured society; afterall, the lesson was not to “create a perfect representation” it was to “investigate the implications of social class.”  

I returned to the why of my outcomes and asked pupils, “Why have we been learning like this? How has it helped us with our understanding of Blood Brothers?” The answers came with confidence: “This has helped us to feel what it is like being Micky and Eddie.” “We can understand what it was like to be in a fractured society and we will be able to see it better in the story.” “We can analyse social class better when we know what we are talking about.”

The pupils now had a real life experience to draw upon; they felt jealousy, they felt lack, they felt self importance and abundance. They could picture life in Micky and Eddie’s Liverpool because, for one lesson, they had lived it.

One week ago, the pupils told me that Blood Brothers was a boring play; Fingers crossed, I think I am beginning to change their minds.

 

Even in poverty, working hard can pay off

 

 

 

Bored Room to Boardroom

Pupils do not live in the same world as us. Their immediate interests, beliefs and experiences are quite far removed from our own and often, as a result of this gap, we can lose pupils’ interest in our own beloved topics.

I wrote recently of the year 9 class that I was boring senseless with my favourite play Blood Brothers and of how a change of perspective from my point of view of what is exciting and fun, can create a more engaging learning environment. Today I am at it again.

The culture in many schools today is to enter students early for examinations. Like many other Year 11 pupils in the country, my class already have their final grade for GCSE English Language. We are now working towards their English Literature exam.

To put the reflection which is about to follow into context, this class are not A* students; with blood, sweat and tears, we have achieved grade Cs and they cannot see the point in having an English Literature qualification. Common questions lately include: “How will poems help me in the construction industry?” “When will I ever use this knowledge again?” “My apprenticeship only asks for a C in English Language; why should I learn about Literature too?” I endeavoured to show them.

 

Th Outcomes

 

Rational

I wanted pupils to recognise the link between skills learned in class and skills which may be required of them in the work place. Analysing poetry is not just about spotting alliteration and explaining what it has been used for. Pupils are learning to look beyond the obvious, to appraise, to explore and come to their own conclusions; we are often working in teams in order to achieve this and so I wanted to create a simulation of a work place experience that could demonstrate how useful these skills may be.

The Simulation

 

The Meeting Table

 

I set the room up like a board room and had the sign “Poetry Inc” displayed upon the whiteboard; playing alongside this, I used the music from The Apprentice to create an exciting atmosphere for the pupils to walk into. The situation being that we were a team of researchers working for the exam board AQA. We were employed to find appropriate poems for the English Literature exam. We were preparing to present our findings to the boss of AQA; this meeting was to take place in one hour and we must be confident in our ability to pitch our chosen poems (poems that we have already studied in class). We would need to demonstrate that they contained all of the necessary elements that pupils can use to explore (interesting language features/ structural devices/ obvious set theme etc…).

 The pupils were treated like adults and I attempted to give them adult choices by providing them with refreshments such as still and sparkling water and a few nibbles. The ‘code of conduct’ was explained to them as a polite reminder but they were told to feel free to help themselves to snacks as we worked. I wanted them to feel grown up, to feel that they were making an informed choice for their actions which was not just down to following the usual school rules. I also wanted them to have a glimpse of what life could be like when they are out there in the real world.

 

My Role

As pupils entered the room, they were asked to sign in under my name as chair person. I included my achievements after my name in the form of letters: BA Hons, QTS and AST. I explained that my position as chair person was important as I had worked hard to get where I am. I have qualifications which I am proud of and that can have influence over me gaining a high paid position. I asked them to look at their names and aspire to be the best that they could be rather than settling for the employee position they were in currently.

 

The Tasks

The lesson itself was merely a revision session. I set out all of the tasks that we were going to cover as an agenda. The tasks lead pupils in making informed decisions about which poems they would happily put forward to the boss and which poems they felt we needed to discuss further before he arrived. A letter from the boss was used to explain the expectations and was later used to review. Pupils worked in pairs before presenting their findings and then we worked as one big team to discuss the issues and the resolutions.

 This class are not angels! I expected a degree of immaturity and I was ready for it. I prepared warning notices and a disciplinary office so as to emulate what could happen if they were to break the rules in a work place. I only had to serve two notices for a momentary lapse of maturity and nobody entered the office. On the whole, the pupils engaged with the task and appreciated the change of environment.

Didn't need it..

 

At the end of the agenda I had added AOB and used this as an opportunity to reward hard working pupils. There are a handful of pupils who never complain, who turn up day in and day out putting in110% and they deserved a mention. I wanted to show pupils that with hard work comes reward and so this handful of pupils were my employees of the month. I presented them with a little prize (some mini eggs) and a huge round of applause.

 With this lesson, I wanted to engage and inspire pupils to work hard towards their Literature qualification. Regardless of whether they were going to be a brick layer or a lawyer, they should always aspire to be the best that they can possibly be.

 

Teaching With Laughter

At the beginning of this week my Year 9 class were not looking happy. Their topic this half term is contemporary plays and I have been so looking forward to teaching them all about my favourite play Blood Brothers. Unfortunately, I had one of those horrible moments that many of us have as teachers of a subject we love. For some reason, they just didn’t enjoy it!

As I read out loud the hilarious scene where Micky wishes to be just like his big brother, I was expecting that they would naturally want to investigate the magic behind this little gem of a monologue. However, I raised my head to see a number of seriously bored faces. I took a post it survey at the end of the lesson to ask pupils what they thought of Blood Brothers; to my horror, my suspicions were confirmed and, as funny as the play is, they weren’t enjoying it. Something had to be done!

I could go one of two ways with this information. I could explain to them that they were wrong and if we continued to read the play and get to the good bits, they would learn to love it as much as I do. Why wouldn’t they? There was swearing and everything! Or, I could rethink my approach and attempt to match it to their experiences to recapture their enthusiasm.

I wanted pupils to analyse Micky’s “wish” monologue but for some reason, they were just not engaging with the text. My outcome was for them to understand how important structure is when organising a play and what effect that structure had on an audience. The way I had been going about it, expecting pupils to enjoy the play alone, was not working. Here is what I did instead:

Connect

I gave pupils cut up, Christmas cracker style jokes. They had to match the jokes with their punch lines and discuss what each joke had in common. We discussed how jokes had to be delivered in a certain way to make them funny; we looked at how the pun was usually so obvious that you feel you should have seen it coming. This set the scene nicely for a lesson of exploring the art of creating laughter.

New Information

We then went on to examine two clips. One from Harry Enfield, which worked well to compare to the character of Micky as he is a grown man dressed as a child for comic effect, and one from Catherine Tait from which we pulled ideas about comic timing, delivery, storyline, repetition and expectations of stereotypes.

Search For Meaning

Pupils were presented with their challenge. To use the ideas gathered to make the rest of the class laugh. They had to create a funny monologue in the style of Micky’s wish. They were to think carefully about the character choice, structure, delivery, language choices and timing just as they had seen in the examples. This was immediately met with groans as the fear of having to perform for their classmates consumed them and almost sent them back into their protective stare out of the window phase. However, when I explained that I would be the one performing the monologue as they would be busy watching for the effect of any structural devices used; they immediately fell to work scribbling down ideas for their character.

 

Demonstrate

Once the monologues were complete, I went to work making a fool of myself in the name of fun and learning. I ensured that pupils knew the environment was a ‘no put down zone’ so as to protect my feelings and help me with my confidence. This was very important as I am going to be asking them to do some performing themselves next lesson. By modelling that performing in my class is safe, I hope to encourage them to feel safe enough to take part too. Two of the six monologues did not make pupils laugh. These monologues consisted of me acting like a baby but had no real storyline to them and so pupils didn’t ‘get’ what they needed to laugh at. Information like this proved rather useful in the review.

My Rap

Review

Pupils were asked to review their findings from the lesson against what they knew about Micky’s wish and came up with: There needs to be sense behind the silliness; it works better if you create a character or create a bit of background. Because we know who Micky is and where he comes from, before he does his monologue, it makes sense and so we laugh. They explained that the monologue created by the first group was funny because of the rhyme that they used and this related to Micky’s monologue as he used rhyme; however, his rhyme was used to add to his childishness.

My pupils had the potential to be turned off English this week. If I had continued blindly enjoying reading in my best scouse accent as the pupils stared eagerly at the clock or blankly out of the window, I would have raced through the play at a far faster pace but I could never have received this post it review response:

 

Post it review